February
15, 2007 could turn out to be the most important date in the history of
the premium cigar industry. Why, you ask? Because every cigar
introduced after that date could soon be made illegal by the Food &
Drug Administration (FDA).
While the so-called Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTC)—the bill giving the FDA the
power to regulate cigars—didn’t pass until June 2009, the legislation
sets February 15, 2007 as the cutoff date for tobacco products to be
grandfathered in as exempt from needing FDA approval before being sold
or marketed in the United States.
Tobacco products introduced after that
date (which comes from the text of the legislation and probably cannot
be altered by the FDA, even if the agency wanted to) must receive the
FDA’s approval before they can be marketed for sale. For a period from
passage of the FSPTC until March 22, 2011, new tobacco products could be
marketed while an application was pending but, as the FDA reiterated recently,
any new product that didn’t have an application submitted by that date
cannot be marketed until the FDA takes action to approve it. This would
apply to cigars when they are subject to FDA regulation, despite the
fact the FDA hadn’t even taken the first step towards regulating cigars
in March 2011, and so no cigar applications would have been submitted.
Theoretically, new cigars should get
approved as “substantially equivalent” to products that were already on
the market in 2007 since the basic components of handmade cigars haven’t
changed in at least a century. But the process is surprisingly complicated,
likely very expensive, and includes an “Environmental Assessment” and a
“Health Information Summary” along with a requirement for scientific
studies about how the product would be used in comparison to the product
it is being claimed as substantially equivalent to. In other words,
you’d probably need deep pockets, lawyers, and scientists to have a
chance.
Plus, so far the FDA hasn’t shown any ability to handle existing applications. As we observed
when the Deeming Rule was first proposed, only a few dozen of the 4,000
pending applications were ruled on as of April last year, with just 17
being approved over the period of multiple years. As of now, the FDA
site says it has approved only 132 products as “Substantially
Equivalent” since 2011, while an untold amount remain waiting for a
ruling.
The FDA did propose in its rules one option for an exemption for premium cigars with a retail price of $10 or more,
but even if the agency adopts that option it would leave the vast
majority of cigars (85%, according to one analysis) to be banished from
the market and forced to wait for an approval that may be nearly
impossible to get.
February 15, 2007 is a long time ago, so allow me to set the stage: On that date we published a Quick Smoke of the Gispert Lonsdale
(remember that cigar?), and you couldn’t yet buy an Apple iPhone
because the first one didn’t go on sale until later that summer.
As far as cigars go, here are just a few
introduced in 2007, but after the February cutoff date: Oliva Serie V,
San Cristobal, PadrĂ³n Serie 1926 80 Years, CAO America, Te-Amo World
Selection Series, Santa Rosa (an Altadis cigar I forgot ever existed),
Rocky Patel Sumatra Edge, Cabaiguan Guapo, La Aurora Corojo Oscuro
Barrel Aged, and the Cuban Cohiba Maduro (which, if the embargo ever
ends, would also be subject to the regulations).
To say the industry has changed since
then would be a gross understatement, as evidenced by the fact that
multiple cigars listed above are no longer being made. For most cigar
smokers I talk with, the vast majority of cigars they smoke were
introduced well after 2007.
Cigar rights groups are now looking to
push legislation that would amend the date for new cigars to be
grandfathered in. This seems extremely reasonable. After all, how can
cigars have complied with a regulation two years before passage of the
bill authorizing the FDA to regulate cigars, and five years before the
agency took any steps towards exercising its power to regulate cigars?
The problem is that reasonable doesn’t buy you much when it comes to passing federal laws. And considering the difficulty in getting support for the Traditional Cigar Manufacturing and Small Business Jobs Preservation Act
in Congress, there isn’t much indication that there are majorities in
Congress that want to treat cigars reasonably, nor that President Obama
would sign such legislation if it somehow made it to his desk.
No comments:
Post a Comment